wedding invitations - Wedding Bouquet

Tags: wedding invitations, vintage , floral etching, botanicals, monogram, etching, sketch, floral frame, retro design

Designers were asked to submit a chic and modern design. If you see a design that is not available for sale, please email us and we will help you purchase the design.

About chris

Chris Griffith
  • Minted Aug 27, 2011
  • 138 Awards
  • 5211 Comments made
  • 41567 Votes cast

Share This Design

To link to this design on other websites, copy & paste this HTML.

About the Design

comments from chris:

A sketched floral monogram design with a sweet vintage feel.

tags:

wedding invitations, vintage , floral etching, botanicals, monogram, etching, sketch, floral frame, retro design

colors shown:

blue, taupe

fonts:

melanie lane, naive, trend slab

design inspired by:

A7 Non-Photo Wedding Invitation

submitted on:

Dec 07 2014

Edited on:

Dec 07 2014

average score:

3.09

comments:

2

To Have and To Hold Wedding Invitation Challenge - See designs critique this design

winner
rating closed
final average score: 3.09
rating distribution
5
4
3
2
1
wedding invitations - Wedding Bouquet by Chris Griffith

comments

Lori Wemple on Dec 7, 2014 at 6:23pm
Lori Wemple
  • Minted Nov 19, 2011
  • 426 Awards
  • 4760 Comments made
  • 11728 Votes cast

Chris you are crazy awesome. hot dang!

Susan Brown on Jan 17, 2015 at 4:42am
Susan Brown
  • Minted May 18, 2011
  • 205 Awards
  • 2562 Comments made
  • 108018 Votes cast

Way to go Chris! I don't even know how many you won but you were awesome. Great work.

Version 6 - submitted on Dec 07 2014 - no comments

Version 5 (poll) - submitted on Dec 07 2014 - hide

Kimberly Morgan on Dec 7, 2014 at 9:20am
Kimberly Morgan
  • Minted Aug 2, 2009
  • 71 Awards
  • 3132 Comments made
  • 75128 Votes cast

Font, A. Color, can't choose!

Shirley Lin Schneider on Dec 7, 2014 at 9:51am
Shirley Lin Schneider
  • Minted Dec 26, 2010
  • 245 Awards
  • 1217 Comments made
  • 19693 Votes cast

So pretty! I like A

Naomi Ernest on Dec 7, 2014 at 10:14am
Naomi Ernest
  • Minted Dec 31, 2011
  • 24 Awards
  • 1896 Comments made
  • 11821 Votes cast

A. Very well balanced and the fonts seem to suit your beautiful design perfectly. :)

Keen Peachy on Dec 7, 2014 at 10:40am
Keen Peachy
  • Minted Feb 28, 2013
  • 61 Awards
  • 1186 Comments made
  • 78881 Votes cast

Tough one! Both are so pretty in their own way. I picked a since the names stand out more, but maybe the font size could be a little smaller so the names don't overpower? Just a suggestion! Pretty design!

curiouszhi design on Dec 7, 2014 at 10:48am
curiouszhi design
  • Minted Dec 17, 2013
  • 23 Awards
  • 1105 Comments made
  • 15011 Votes cast

I picked A. The fonts work better! Lovely design!

Jan Shepherd on Dec 7, 2014 at 11:40am
Jan Shepherd
  • Minted Jul 5, 2014
  • 8 Awards
  • 2377 Comments made
  • 9244 Votes cast

Love the typography in A. - difficult choice with background shades - depends on the bride's choice of nude really.

RedRedOrange on Dec 7, 2014 at 11:53am
RedRedOrange
  • Minted Jan 12, 2010
  • 14 Awards
  • 295 Comments made
  • 6546 Votes cast

A all around. very solid.

Kelly Schmidt on Dec 7, 2014 at 12:32pm
Kelly Schmidt
  • Minted Jun 18, 2014
  • 104 Awards
  • 1588 Comments made
  • 5894 Votes cast

A for me! I do like B a lot as well though and the lighter colour is nice. I like how the font for the names in A stand out and contrast with the softer details of the illustration. I agree with another comment that the names could be a touch smaller. Beautiful!

Amy Moen on Dec 7, 2014 at 1:19pm
Amy Moen
  • Minted Jan 16, 2014
  • 10 Awards
  • 243 Comments made
  • 3295 Votes cast

A for me.

Version 4 - submitted on Dec 07 2014 - no comments

Version 3 (poll) - submitted on Dec 07 2014 - hide

Chris Griffith on Dec 7, 2014 at 8:53am
Chris Griffith
  • Minted Aug 27, 2011
  • 138 Awards
  • 5211 Comments made
  • 41567 Votes cast

Which font is better for the names and do you like the background of A better than B?

Version 2 - submitted on Dec 07 2014 - no comments

Version 1 - submitted on Dec 07 2014 - no comments